User talk:Rsterbal/What belongs in Meta?

The main concern now is that meta gets guidelines or non-sysadmin admins
 * the only way to get non-sysadmin admins is for non-sysadmins to apply for the rights


 * In my opinion, a record of material you have asked to be created on Meta, and told why not, belongs in your userspace.  13:25 19-Oct-2017
 * I think the role of Meta administrators is a bit misunderstood. Meta admins are mostly there to deal with maintenance tasks and to help fight against spam (protect pages, delete pages, etc.). It is sometimes the case that they also must intervene in other matters, but that is rare. I don't think we need more administrators just to be able to have guidelines or discussions. Discussions can be held by any user, and as John mentioned on IRC, administrators comments' will generally have the same weight as user's comments, unless they are imposing a policy. Therefore, I think having extra administrators would not necessarily change anything, what we need to have is users willing to propose new policies and discuss them. Reception123 (talk) ('C' ) 16:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

This page is to be a source of examples from all users about pages that have been removed or not approved on Meta. It is an important topic of conversation. I think the current admins are too biased to do the job well. Rsterbal (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this page is a protest, then the page name should reflect that. "Biased" toward, or against, what, please?   00:41 20-Oct-2017

This page is a brief catalog of the types of pages and content that have been deemed unacceptable on Meta. Rsterbal (talk) 01:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd like to ask in what way are the administrators biased? Also, I will again give my reasoning for why I personally think that these pages wouldn't belong on Meta (at least not in the format you are proposing). For the downtime page, I honestly don't really have a problem with it being on Meta, but as I said for it to make sense it needs to be updated regularly, and Icinga and [status.mirhaeze.org] are better at doing so since they are automatic. I don't think people should have to do the work if it is already automatized. The reason we have reports on major downtime is mainly so that we can learn from our mistakes, and take measures to prevent the downtime.

As for the category since there already is one why would we need another? Reception123 (talk) ('C' ) 04:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)